Results of Bone Marrow Examination Over 9 Years Period in Iraqi Patients from Babil Province

Najlaa Bader Alawadi
Authors Emails are requested on demand or by logging in
Keywords : Bone marrow examination, Aspiration, biopsy, Non-Hodgkin s lymphoma
Medical Journal of Babylon  13:1 , 2016 doi:1812-156X-13-1
Published :15 April 2016


The aim of this study is to assess the results of bone marrow aspiration with or without trephine biopsy in Babil province. In this observational study, 5644 Iraqi patients were included, male: female ratio was 1.3:1 and age range was 1-78 years. The patients attended hospital for bone marrow aspiration with or without biopsy over a period of 9 years from 1st March 2006 till 1st March 2015. Pallor and anemia (55.3 %) were the most common indication. The morphological examination of blood film and bone marrow were performed. The final diagnosis was reached in 93.21% (5261/5644) of patients by morphological examination of bone marrow samples only. However, other 383 (6.78%) of patients needed further advanced tests. The result of BME was normal in 28.72% (1621/5644) of patients which was the most common result. Non-Hodgkin s lymphoma was the cause of bone lytic lesions in a significant number of cases and it should be kept in mind. This study concluded that bone marrow examination is a worthy test and can reach the diagnosis in majority of cases with morphological examination only, and this ratio can be increased by introduction of other supplementary tests like CD markers and immunohistochemistry. Normal results also helped diagnosis by their exclusive value. Doctors must be encouraged to request BME whenever they found it indicated.


Bone marrow examination was first applied to clinical evaluation in 1905, when the Italian physician Pianese reported bone marrow infiltration by the parasite Leishmania [1]. Currently, inspection of bone marrow is considered one of the most valuable diagnostic tools for evaluating hematologic disorders [2]. Indications have included diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic monitoring for lymphoproliferative disorders (such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphoma), myeloproliferative disorders, myelodysplatic syndrome and multiple myeloma. In addition, evaluation of cytopenia and leukocytosis can be performed [3]. The Use of bone marrow examination has grown to include other, nonhematologic, conditions like, for example, in the investigation for fever of unknown origin (FUO), specifically in patients with autoimmune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) [4]. In addition, the diagnosis of storage diseases (eg. Niemann-Pick disease and Gaucher disease) [5] and the assessment for metastatic carcinoma and granulomatous diseases (eg, sarcoidosis) can be performed. Bone marrow analysis can also be done in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), incidental elevated serum paraprotein levels, iron deficiency anemia and iron status, polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, or infectious mononucleosis; but these conditions are often more appropriately diagnosed by routine laboratory evaluation [6]. Sampling of the marrow consists of aspiration of the cellular component, tissue biopsy, or both. Aspiration of the marrow has been primarily utilized for cytologic assessment, with analysis directed toward assessing the morphology and obtaining a differential cell count. Further sampling allows material to be directed toward other ancillary tests, such as cytogenetics, molecular studies, microbiologic cultures, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. While biopsies allow evaluation of the marrow’s overall cellularity, detection of focal lesions, and determination of the extent of infiltration by various pathologic entities [7-9]. Aspiration sampling is usually performed before biopsy. The reason is that the biopsy technique increases thromboplastic substances which leads to a reduction in the effectiveness of an aspiration sampling.[8,10,11] Controversy exists about bilateral iliac biopsies. However, some studies have found that this technique increases the probability of detecting focal lesions like carcinoma and lymphoma staging, where 11-16% of cases may be missed with unilateral biopsies [12]. The aim of this study is to assess the results of BME (aspiration with or without biopsy) in Babil province, to assess the importance of BME in confirming some pathologies or excluding others, and to assess to what extent that morphological BME only is enough to reach definite diagnosis.

Materials and methods

This is an observasional study included 5644 Iraqi patients from Babil province in the middle of Iraq 100 Km south of Baghdad. 56.9% (3212/5644) of them were males and 43.1% (2432/5644) were females. The patient s age ranged from 1-78 years with maximum number in age group from 20 – 60 years and mean age was 38.8 years.
     The patients attended Merjan Teaching Hospital, Al-Hilla Teaching Hospital or a private laboratory for multiple complaints requiring bone marrow examination (BME). They represented almost all cases who had done BME in Babil over a period of 9 years from 1st March 2006 till 1st March 2015. For all patients, a relevant medical history and physical examination were done by a consultant physician, then blood samples were taken for blood smear examination, while bone marrow samples were collected either aspiration alone as in 77.73% (4387/5644) of cases or aspiration and biopsy as in 22.27% (1257/5644) of them. Other supplementary blood test were performed according to need e.g. blood sugar, ranal function, ferritin, B12, folate...etc and some relevant radiological investigations were done. No additional tests (like special stains or CD markers) were performed on the bone marrow samples except for some suspicious cases who could offer for the cost as they weren t available for free in Babil hospitals.
     Bone marrow was aspirated with or without biopsy (according to physician s request) from posterior superior iliac crest under local anesthesia (2-3 ml of lidocaine). The aspiration samples were stained with standard stains used for the initial evaluation include Wright and May-Grunwald-Giemsa stains, which enhance cytologic detail, while biopsy samples were processed, stained with H and E stain [13,14] and examined. The morphological examination of blood film and bone marrow were performed by an expert hematologist using Olymbus CX20 light microscope.
     The indications and type of BME were documented, the results were followed and any additional tests performed were checked. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics (the mean and median).


A total of 5644 Iraqi patients were enrolled in the study. Male: female ratio was 1.3:1 and mean age was 38.8 years. The age distribution of the patients was demonstrated in table (1). Most of the patients 69.93% (3947/5644) were aged 20-60 years. Indications for requesting BME were shown in table (2). The patient might have more than one indication e.g. anemia, thrombocytopenia and splenomegally. Pallor and anemia (55.3 %) were the most common indication for BME in this study followed by leukocytosis (51.26 %) and bleeding tendency (35.28 %). The final diagnosis was reached in 93.21% (5261/5644) of patients by morphological examination of bone marrow samples only. However, other 6.79% (383/5644) of patients had abnormal marrow and definite diagnosis needed further advanced investigations to be performed on bone marrow samples. We had enforced to send those patients to hematological centers in Baghdad or abroad in Jordan, Lebanon or India for further assessment. 174 of them couldn t of or for the cost and continued to be undiagnosed. In others 209 (%); further tests were done and final diagnosis was reached in 183 (88 %) of them; but remained obscure in 26 patients. So by the end of this study, we had 200 cases without definite diagnosis. The result of BME was normal in 28.72% (1621/5644) of patients which was the most common result. The 5 most common diseases diagnosed were acute myeloblastic leukemia (12.76 %), acute lymphoblastc leukemia (10.95 %), multiple myeloma (8.65 %), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (7.32 %) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (6.72 %). Table (3)


Discussion In this study, 5644 Iraqi patients were included over a period of 9 years. Bone marrow examination (BME) was indicated in all of them, whether to confirm or exclude a disease. To the extent of my knowledge and my internet search, no similar study is present. I didn t find any previous study describing the ratio of different diagnoses of BME or the percentage of different indications of BME. More than 28 % of results in the recent study were normal. These normal results might have a significant exclusive importance, however, requesting a non-indicated BME may be a possible cause. Normal bone marrow result is as important as diseased one. Hence, this large ratio of normal results mustn t be against requesting bone marrow test when indicated, especially if safety of the procedure is taken in consideration. In 2002 the British Society of Haematology initiated an annual survey to assess the various types and incidence of bone marrow biopsy adverse events.[15] Bain summarized results of a 7-year (1995-2001) retrospective study and identified 26 adverse events among approximately 54,890 biopsies, with an overall annual incidence of 0.05%. The most common side effects, in order of decreasing frequency, were hemorrhage, needle breakage and infections. Risk factors for hemorrhage included concurrent anticoagulation or platelet dysfunction. Two cases were fatal and were attributed to sepsis and massive hemorrhage [15]. Four years later, a prospective study by Bain revealed 15 adverse events in a single year, with an overall incidence of 0.07% [11]. However, although hemorrhage was still considered the most commonly encountered side effect, this study revealed that pain, anaphylactic reaction, and fractures were prominent secondary consequences. Two fatalities, attributed to laceration of blood vessels, were reported from 20,323 bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedures [11]. In this study, non-Hodgkin s lymphoma was an important cause of bone lytic lesions 2.1% (8/384) and should be kept in mind as a possible cause for this lesion; however, multiple myeloma was still the most common cause. Normal bone marrow (16.4%) in patients with lytic lesion was more common than secondary metastasis to marrow (8.9%). Most common sites of primary malignancy were breast and gastro-intestinal tumors. Ehara et al found that bone osteolysis in patients with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATLL) is a paraneoplastic feature and caused by parathyroid hormone-related peptides (PTHrP) [16]. While in the recent study, it was found that bone lytic lesions were from direct marrow invasion by lymphoma cells. No one of cases was resulted from direct leukemic cells invasion. B-cell lymphomas rarely present with lytic bone lesions, [17,18] and primary bone lymphoma is very rare and it s diagnosis is based on a histopathological examination and imaging studies. Lymphomas are most often found in the axial skeleton, pelvis, femur and humerus. Guzki found that just 0.38% (5/1327) of patients with bone tumors were diagnosed as a case of lymphoma [19]. B-cell type represents 10-20% of lymphoblastic lymphomas [20]. It predominantly presents with extranodal masses especially in the skin and less commonly in the bone [21,22]. Bony lesions are usually osteolytic, although few cases with osteoblastic lesions have been reported [23].


Bone marrow examination is a worthy test as it gave the final diagnosis in this study for more than 93 % of cases with morphological examination only. Normal results also helped diagnosis by their exclusive role for some pathologies. Additional diagnostic or confirmatory tests may be needed in minority of cases. Doctors must be encouraged to request BME whenever they found it indicated whether to diagnose a disease or to exclude another as BME is generally a safe procedure. Non-Hodgkin s lymphoma is an important cause of bone lytic lesions and may need a high index of suspicion to be diagnosed.


1) Parapia LA. Trepanning or trephines: a history of bone marrow biopsy. Br J Haematol. 2007 Oct. 139(1):14-9.
2) Fend F, Tzankov A, Bink K, et al. Modern techniques for the diagnostic evaluation of the trephine bone marrow biopsy: methodological aspects and applications. Prog Histochem. 2008. 42(4):203-52.
3) Desalphine M, Bagga PK, Gupta PK, Kataria AS. To evaluate the role of bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy in pancytopenia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Nov. 8(11):FC11-5.
4) Quesada AE, Tholpady A, Wanger A, Nguyen AN, Chen L. Utility of bone marrow examination for workup of fever of unknown origin in patients with HIV/AIDS. J Clin Pathol. 2015Mar. 68(3):214-5.
5) Sokolowska B, Skomra D, Czartoryska B, Tomczak W, Tylki-Szymanska A, Gromek T, et al. Gaucher disease diagnosed after bone marrow trephine biopsy – a report of two cases. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2011. 49(2):352-6.
6) Mazzella FM, Perrotta G. Peripheral blood and bone marrow. Schumacher HR, Rock WA, Stass SA, eds. Handbook of Hematologic Pathology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker. Inc.; 2000. 1-26.
7) Bain BJ. Bone marrow trephine biopsy. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Oct. 54(10):737-42.
8) Trewhitt KG. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: collection and interpretation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Oct. 28(9):1409-15; quiz 1416-7.
9) Wilkins BS. Pitfalls in bone marrow pathology: avoiding errors in bone marrow trephine biopsy diagnosis. J Clin Pathol. 2011 May. 64(5):380-6.
10) Riley RS, Hogan TF, Pavot DR, et al. A pathlogist s perspective on bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: Performing a bone marrow examination. J Clin Lab Anal. 2004. 18(2):70-90.
11) Bain BJ. Morbidity associated with bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy – a review of UK data for 2004. Haematologica. 2006 Sep. 91(9):1293-4.
12) Barekman CL, Fair KP, Cotelingam JD. Comparative utility of diagnostic bone marrow components: a 10-year study. Am J Hematol. 1997 Sep. 56(1):37-41.
13) Choby B. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. In: Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, eds.Choby B. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. In: Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, eds. Pfenninger & Fowler s Procedures for Primary Care. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2010:chap 205.
14) Hutchison RE, McPherson RA, Schexneider KI. Basic examination of blood and bone marrow. In: McPherson RA, Pincus MR, eds.Hutchison RE, McPherson RA, Schexneider KI. Basic examination of blood and bone marrow. In: McPherson RA, Pincus MR, eds. Henry s Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. 22nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011:chap 30
15) Bain BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity and mortality. Br J Haematol. 2003 Jan. 121(6):949-51.
16) Ehara S, Takahashi K, Nishida J, et al. Hand osteolysis in patients with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma: radiographic characteristics. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;236(1):63-9.
17) Muhamad AM, Justin LS, Hayan J. Hypercalcemia, renal failure and skull lytic lesions: Follicular lymphoma masquerading as multiple myeloma, J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2013 Apr-Jun; 1(2):2324709613486356. Published online 2013 Apr 12.
18) Rossi JF, Bataille R, Chappard D, Alexandre C, Janbon C. B cell malignancies presenting with unusual bone involvement and mimicking multiple myeloma. Study of nine cases. Am J Med. 1987;83:10-16.
19) Guzki G. Primary bone lymphoma – experience of oncological orthopaedics department in Brzozow. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):327-38.
20) Knowles DM. Lymphoblastic lymphoma. In: Knowles DM, editor. Neoplastic Hematopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 915–52.
21) Belgaumi AF, Al-Kofide A, Sabbah R, Shalaby L. Precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (PBLL) in children: Pattern of presentation and outcome. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005;17:15–9.
22) Heinrich SD, Gallagher D, Warrior R, Phelan K, George VT, MacEwen GD. The prognostic significance of the skeletal manifestations of acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:105–11.
23) Recine M, Castellano-Sanchez AA, Sheldon J, Schwartz M, Cabello-Inchausti B. Precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia presenting as osteoblastic bone lesions. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2002;6:236–43.

The complete article is available as a PDF File that is freely accessible. The fully formatted HTML version can be viewed as HTML Page.

Medical Journal of Babylon

volume 13 : 1

Share |

Viewing Options

Download Abstract File

Related literature

Cited By
Google Blog Search
Other Articles by authors

Related articles/pages

On Google
On Google Scholar
On UOBabylon Rep

User Interaction

597  Users accessed this article in 1 year past
Last Access was at
20/05/2018 07:56:42