Preliminary over-Head Traction Followed by Closed Reduction Versus Closed Reduction without Preliminary over-Head Traction; A Comparative Study Discussing The Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of The Hip (DDH) From The Age of 6 To 24 Months

Adnan Esa Alkilaby,Mohammed Jaafer Alwash
Authors Emails are requested on demand or by logging in
Keywords : DDH, overhead traction, closed reduction
Medical Journal of Babylon  13:3 , 2016 doi:1812-156X-13-3
Published :31 December 2016


There is a controversy whether to use preliminary over-head traction or not prior closed reduction in infants treated for DDH. The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of 2 groups of patients; the first group was treated by closed reduction preceded by overhead traction for 2 weeks, while the second group was treated by closed reduction without preliminary traction. This prospective study reviewed the clinical and radiological outcome of 84 hips in 67 patients having DDH treated in Al-Sader Teaching Hospital between March 2005 & January 2014. The mean age at the time of the operation was 14 months. The female to male ratio in our study was 8.5: 1.5. The mean period of follow up was 58 months. The rate of satisfactory results in the first group was 89.5% which is higher than that of the second group in which the rate of satisfactory results was 80.4%. This study revealed that overhead traction followed by closed reduction give better results and low rate of complications and this justified in patients with DDH aging 6-24 months old.


Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a congenital plus/minus environmental malformation affecting the proximal part of the femur and acetabulum that leads to hip subluxation and dislocation with or without acetabular dysplasia. Early diagnosis and treatment is crucial because failure to diagnose and treat DDH at early months of the life may result in significant morbidity [1-3]. The reported incidence of neonatal hip instability is 5-20 per 1000 live births; Any way, most of these hips stabilize spontaneously within 3 weeks, and on re-examination 3 weeks after birth the incidence of instability decrease to 1-2 per 1000 infants. Females are much more commonly affected than males. The left hip is more commonly affected than the right hip [4]. Breech position, swaddling, familial ligamentous hyperlaxity, genetic factors, and hormonal factors (females) are the most prominent aetiological conditions [5-9]. The diagnosis of cases at birth still unrealized, for this reason, a newborn baby should be examined for signs of hip instability. Ortolani maneuver and Barlow’s test are of great help in the diagnosis of DDH in neonates [4,10,11,12,13]. Additional physical findings for the diagnosis of late unilateral dislocation include asymmetry of the gluteal skin crease or labial skin folds, limited abduction on the affected side, standing or walking with external rotation of the affected leg, limping, and leg-length discrepancy . In bilateral DDH, there is limitation of abduction of both hips, delayed walking, waddling gait with hyperlordosis [14]. Diagnosis of DDH by x-ray in infancy is almost completely forbidden nowadays because it has been replaced by sonographic examination, ultrasound is more informative with no radiation hazards [15-19]. Ultrasound examination is the only diagnostic tool that permits real-time assessment and a three-dimensional view of a neonate’s hip. The cartilaginous head & acetabulum can be readily seen on ultrasonography; the relationship between each other can be calculated statically & dynamically. The newborn should be examined clinically for DDH at birth, and then the suspicious and at-risk patients should be selectively examined with ultrasound. An ultrasound examination is typically performed either by assessing the alpha and beta angles (static examination) or by performing a dynamic examination. The alpha angle determines the slope of the superior aspect of the bony acetabular socket, with an angle greater than 60 ? considered normal. The beta angle considered normal if less than 55 ?, depicts the cartilaginous component of the acetabular socket. Many centers now use a dynamic form of ultrasound, as shown by Harcke [20-24]. Because the center of the femoral head begins to ossify at the age of 6 months-1 year, the diagnosis must then be made radiologically. The anterio-posterior view in the infant should always be an x-ray of both hips so that the horizontal situation of pelvis can be evaluated and both hips can be compared. A few guidelines will facilitate a general assessment of the AP view of an infant`s radiograph (fig. 1). 1-The Hilgenreiner line which joins the center of triradiate cartilage in transverse direction. 2.The Ombrédanne line is drawn from the lateral edge of the acetabular roof, and crosses through the Hilgenreiner line to form four quadrants. In normal x-ray the center of the femoral head lie in the lower inner quadrant. 3- Orientation line according to Shenton and Ménard: Normally there is smooth continuation of the line drawn along the medial border of the femoral neck and then passing through the superior border of the obturator foramen in a well formed arc. In congenital dislocation of hip this arc (or what is called Shenton`s line) is disrupted. 4- Acetabular index = AC or Acetabular roof angle: angle between Hilgenreiner line and the line joining the triradiate cartilage and the lateral acetabular epiphysis. Normally the angle at birth is about 30°, at 1 year age it is few degrees over 20° and at 3 years of age less than 20° [15-19].

Materials and methods

Between march 2005 and January 2014, 84 dislocated hips (in 67  patients with DDH) were treated in the orthopedic department of AL-Sader Teaching hospital. Patients who had a neuromuscular or teratological dislocation had been excluded from the study previously. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the first group composed of 38 hips while the second one composed of 46 hips. The first group were treated by preliminary overhead traction for 2 weeks followed by closed reduction; a skin traction was applied  for both legs   with the hips flexed at 90–100°, abducted approximately 20° and with the extension of both knee joints. A weight of 1-1.75 Kg is applied to the patient s legs. The degree of traction should be arranged to produce a hip flexion of more than 90 degrees. Then the legs are gradually abducted to achieve an abduction of around 70 degrees after 10-14 days.
The second group was treated by closed reduction without any preliminary traction. In both groups, closed reduction was done under general anesthesia with the aid of adductor tenotomy. Concentric reduction of the hip was verified with radiographs.  All reduced hips were immobilized in hip spica in which the hips are flexed by up to 100-120 degrees and abducted to 50-60 degrees. Hip spica was applied for 6 weeks followed by abduction splint for another 6 weeks. Partial weight bearing was permitted while the patient wearing the splint at the last 3 weeks, followed by full weight bearing as early as the patient could.
There were ten male and fifty-seven female patients. Four of the ten male patients and 13 of the fifty-seven female patients had a bilateral procedure. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 14 months (range, 6-24 months) for all patients.
Thirty-seven right hips and 47 left hips were involved. The mean period of follow up was 58 months (range 23-72 months).
From the total number of patients there were 45 patients (67 %) firstborn children, ten patients (15 %) had a positive family history of congenital hip dislocation, Fifteen patients (22.3 %) had a positive history of breech presentation and 15% were delivered by cesarean section.


Sixty seven children with 84 hips were included in our study. 20.2% of patients had bilateral DDH, while 79.8% of them had unilateral DDH. The left side was affected in 56% of patients while the right side was affected in 44%.The female to male ratio in our study was 8.5 : 1.5.The age of our patients was ranging between 6-24 months (mean 11 months). The mean period of follow up was 58 months. Preoperative evaluation of the involved hips was done according to Tonnis classification [27]. Post-operatively, the results were evaluated functionally and radiologically. Functional assessment was done according to Harris [28] scoring system while radiological assessment was done according to Severin classification [29]. Thirty four hips (89.5% 34) in the first group(preliminary traction) had either excellent or good results(Harris); 80.43% of the hips (37 hips) in the second group(without traction) had either excellent or good results (Harris). Table (1)


Many papers have discussed the benefit of closed reduction in the management of DDH. In our study we compared the result of closed reduction in 2 groups of hips; one of them underwent preliminary overhead traction followed by closed reduction while the second group underwent closed reduction without overhead traction. Closed reduction of DDH under general anesthesia is typically attempted in children aged 6-24 months. The use of preliminary traction is controversial. Proponents of traction believe that slow, gentle stretching of both the neurovascular structures and the soft tissues about the hip increases the likelihood of a successful reduction and minimizes the risk of osteonecrosis [29]. A study of Gage and Winter seems to support the use of traction [32]. In contrast, Brougham found that traction did not influence the rate of osteonecrosis [33]. Fish et al [34] published a paper conducted by the Pediatric Orthopedics Society of North America; 87% of the 335 members of POSNA replied to a questionnaire prepared to define the role of pre-reduction traction in the treatment of DDH; 95% of the participants used preliminary traction and most of them supposed that traction decreases the incidence of avascular necrosis and facilitates closed reduction. Traction improves the success rate of closed reduction and decrease the incidence of avascular necrosis of the head of femur [35]. In North America most orthopedic surgeons use traction in a modified overhead position with the hips in some degree of flexion [34,36]. This position relax the iliopsoas, but unless the hips are significantly abducted, no effect can be expected to perform reduction. Salter et al. demonstrated the importance of avoiding excessive abduction position which may cause growth disturbances of the femoral head. However adductor tenotomy at the time of closed reduction play a major role in facilitating reduction and decreasing the incidence of avascular necrosis [37]. Zionts and MacEwen used traction in their study reporting a success rate of 75 per cent of their patients. DeRosa and Feller reported a success rate of 91 per cent after using preliminary traction in the treatment of DDH [36,37]. In the present series, the success rate was 89.5 % using preliminary traction.Fig.7


The use of preliminary over head traction for 2-3 weeks before attempting closed reduction in patients with DDH aging 6-24 months old, recommended by many authors.


1. american academy of pediatrics. pediatrics. clinical practice guideline: early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. committee on quality improvement, subcommittee on developmental dysplasia of the hip. 2000 105 (4 pt 1): 896-905. [medline].
2. sankar wn, weiss j, skaggs dl. orthopedic conditions in the newborn. j am acad orthop surg. 2009 17(2):112-22.
3. karmazyn bk, gunderman rb, coley bd, blatt er, bulas d, fordham l, et al. acr appropriateness criteria on developmental dysplasia of the hip child. j am coll radiol. 2009 6(8):551-557. [medline].
4. louis s., david j., selvadurai n. developmental dysplasia of the hip. apleys system of orthopedics and fractures. 8th edition. 2001 2(19): 409-418.
5. dennis s.w. developmental displacement of hip. pediatric orthopedics for primary care physician. 2004 2(3):42-47.
6. gerscovich eo. infant hip in developmental dysplasia: facts to consider for a successful diagnostic ultrasound examination. appl radiol. 1999 18-25.
7. nelson we, behrman re, kliegman rm, et al. nelson textbook of pediatrics. 15th ed. philadelphia, pa: wb saunders 1996.
8. schwend rm, schoenecker p, richards bs, flynn jm, vitale m. screening the newborn for developmental dysplasia of the hip: now what do we do?. j pediatric orthop. 2007 27(6):607-610. [medline].
9. hennrikus wl. developmental dysplasia of the hip: diagnosis and treatment in children younger than 6 months. pediatr ann.1999 28(12):740-746. [medline].
10. bond cd, hennrikus wl, della maggiore ed. prospective evaluation of newborn soft-tissue hip "clicks" with ultrasound. j pediatric orhopedicst developmental dysplasia of the hip. hop.1997 17(2):199-201. [medline].
11. darmonov av, zagora s. clinical screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. j bone joint surg am.1996 78(3):383-388. [medline].
12. ortolani m. congenital hip dysplasia in the light of early and very early diagnosis. clin orthop relat res. 1976 119:6-10.
13. barlow tg (1962) early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. j bone joint surg (br) 44: 292–301
14. james j mccarthy. developmental dysplasia of the hip. sep 23, 2009.
15. albinana j, morcuende ja, weinstein sl (1996) the teardroping in congenital dislocation of the hip diagnosed late. j bone joint surg (am) 78: 1048–1055.
16. hilgenreiner (1925) zur fruhdiagnose und fruhbehandlung der angeborenen huftgelenkverrenkung. med klin 21: 1385–8, 1425–1429.
17. myers s, eijer h, ganz r (1999) anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. clin orthop 363: 93–99.
18. suzuki s, kashiwagi n, kasahara y, seto y, futami t. avascular necrosis and the pavlik harness. j bone joint surg (br) 1996 78:631–635.
19. honda m. et al. infant hip joint diagnostic support system based on clinical manifestations and x-ray images. acta med okayama. 2010 64(3):189-196.
20. graf r. the diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic comboun treatment. arch orthop trauma surg, 1980 97: 117-133.
21. harcke ht, grissom le. infant hip sonography: current concepts. semin ultrasound ct mri, 1994 15: 256-263.
22. wientroub s, grill f. ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip. j bone joint surg am, 2000 82: 1004-1018.
23. harcke ht, kumar sj. the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. j bone joint surg am, 1991 73: 622-628.
24. rosendahl k, markestad t, lie rt. ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. pediatrics, 1994 94: 47-52.
25. fritz hefti et al. ddh & cdh. pediatric orthopedic in practice. springer.2007 3(2)2:177-201.
26. schoenecker pl & strecker wb. cdh in children. comparison of the effects of femoral shortening & of skeletal traction in treatment. jbjs. am. jan. 1984 66(1):21-27.
27. budak akman et al. treatment of tonnis type ii hip dysplasia with or without open reduction in children older than 18 months :- a preliminary report. j. child orthopedic.2009-august 3(4):307-311.
28. harris wh. traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. j bone joint surg am. 1969 jun 51(4):737-755.
29. w.timothy ward et al. severin classification system for evaluation of the results of operative treatment of cdh. a study of intraobserver & interobserver reliability. jbjs\american.1997 01 79 (5): 656-663.
30. jose a.m. et al. long-term outcome after open reduction through an anteromedial approach for cdh. the journal of bone and joint surgery (american). 1997 79:810-817.
31. michael g. and david l..ddh from 6 months to 4 years of age. american academy of orthopedic surgeons. 2001 9(6):401-411.
32. gage jr, winter rb. avascular necrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis as a complication of closed reduction of cdh:a critical review of 20 years. j bone joint surg am.1972 54:373-388.
33. brougham et al. avascular necrosis following closed reduction of cdh. review of influencing factors and long term follow up. j bone joint surg br.1990 72:557-562.
34. fish dn et al. current practice in use of prereduction traction for cdh.j pediatr. orthop. 1991 11(2):149-153.

35. yamada n. et al. closed reduction of ddh by prolonged traction. j bone joint surg br. 2003 85:1173-1177.
36. derosa gp, feller n: treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. management before walking age. clinical orthopaedics and related research 225: 77–85, 1987.
37. salter rb, kostiuk j, dallas s: avascular necrosis of the femoral head as a complication of treatment for congenital dislocation of the hip in young children: a clinical and experimental investigation. canadian journal of surgery 12: 44 –61, 1969.
38.macrine sibiniski and et al, march 2006, the value of preliminary overhead traction in the closed management of ddh int. orthop 2006 30(4): 268-271.
39. clifford r. wheeless iii, md. closed reduction for ddh last updatingd aug. 2012.
40. m bhatia, b joseph. is routine pre-reduction traction necessary for children with ddh? ijo (indian journal of orthopedics, 2003 37(4) 241-243.
41. zionts le, macewen gd: treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in children between the ages of one and three years. journal of bone and joint surgery [am] 1986 68: 829– 846.

The complete article is available as a PDF File that is freely accessible. The fully formatted HTML version can be viewed as HTML Page.

Medical Journal of Babylon

volume 13 : 3

Share |

Viewing Options

Download Abstract File
( 87 KB )

Related literature

Cited By
Google Blog Search
Other Articles by authors

Related articles/pages

On Google
On Google Scholar
On UOBabylon Rep

User Interaction

137  Users accessed this article in 1 year past
Last Access was at
21/06/2017 08:25:52